数字化驱动民生发展 粤政协委员冀推广智慧民生应用******
中新网广州1月12日电 (记者 蔡敏婕)广东经济发展和科技创新活跃，数字化程度高。广东省政协十三届一次会议正在广州举行，多位委员就“推广智慧民生应用，提升现代公共服务水平”为主题建言献策。
2021年，广东数字经济规模达到5.9万亿元，连续5年居全国首位。广东省在推动数字化与疾病防治融合上同样走在全国前列。
广东省政协委员、科大讯飞高级副总裁杜兰 受访者供图广东省政协委员、中山大学中山眼科中心副主任林浩添带来了一份主题为眼病数字智能化防治的提案，期待通过智能化手段，高效推进眼病防治。
“全国注册眼科医生不过4万多人，相对于患者群体真的太少了。”在林浩添看来，AI医疗可缓解医疗资源不平衡的现状，一方面，能让医生力量薄弱的基层地区患者，享受到更专业的眼科医疗服务；另一方面，还能让诊疗过程变得更高效。
为了让更多的百姓受益，推动数字眼科和健康广东高质量发展，林浩添建议，将数智化眼病筛诊融入数字政府建设，让眼科人工智能技术“走出医院”。
此前，林浩添已在湛江市开展这一试点工作，在粤省事的“i湛江”专区上线了眼表黑色肿物智能诊断系统——“粤睛晶”。有眼表“黑痣”的患者只需拍一张照片，足不出户即可初步判断自己眼表肿物的情况。
“依托数字政府的海量用户及管理平台，嵌入眼病智能筛诊小程序，通过智能手机便可以完成眼病的初筛。”林浩添表示，其后可以在云端健康档案、闭环转诊、精准推荐、流量引导、人机协作等各个方面逐步优化细化，实现医学数据流和用户流的良性发展，让更多百姓真正享受到智慧医疗的便捷与高效。
预计到2030年，广东老年人口占比将突破20%。在“老龄化呈现数量多、速度快、差异大、任务重”的形势下，越来越多的人工智能、互联网等新技术、新产品逐步走进老年人的生活，实时监控警报老年人跌倒的智能手环、支持83种语言翻译的智能翻译机等产品为他们带来便利与幸福感。
围绕“用人工智能助力老人拥有高质量老年生活”的话题，广东省政协委员、科大讯飞高级副总裁杜兰表示，通过调研，她发现，很多老年人在使用这些智能化产品时，存在产品设计不够适老、老年人对产品使用不够熟练、产品价格较高等“痛点”。
杜兰认为，广东省是机器人制造大省，应设立专项支持机器人企业，提升康养机器人、陪伴机器人等产品的智能化水平，进一步支持机器人智能交互开放平台的建设，并通过进一步开放社区、康养院、老年大学等多场景的应用试点，让人工智能技术在养老护老方面发挥更大作用，并组织志愿者组织等力量来加速智能化产品的普及。
此外，杜兰还建议设立专项基金支持重点人群使用智能化产品。“一些智能化产品能较大程度提升失能、半失能以及空巢老人的养老生活质量。建议设立专项基金，通过自主申报、推荐申报以及授权申报等形式，为上述重点人群配备相关智能化产品提供资金和配套服务支持。”她说。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
